Target Your Best Customers With RFM Segmentation Print E-mail
Email Marketing
Written by Emily Chen   
Tuesday, 21 July 2009
Target with RFM SegmentationThere's a predictive modeling and segmentation technique that can dramatically improve email click-throughs and conversions. It's called RFM, and direct marketers have been using it for years to identify their best customers and send them special, tailored offers. Learn how it works and start applying it to your email campaigns.


RFM: a Proven Behavioral Marketing Segmentation Technique


RFM stands for Recency (when the customer placed the last order), Frequency (how many orders the customer placed in a period of time) and Monetary (how much money the customer spent). It relies on the premise that someone who recently bought something, who shopped often and who spent a lot is more likely to respond to your next campaign than someone who bought something a long time ago, shopped infrequently and spent next to nothing.

Coupled with customer lifetime value analysis, RFM enables organizations to significantly increase response rates by sending offers only to the subset that is most likely to buy. In the direct-mail world, where every name comes with set production and shipping costs, there's a strong motivation to pare lists down. As a result, direct marketers have used RFM for decades.

In email marketing, we haven't been quite as motivated because of two common misconceptions:

  • Myth #1: Email is cheap, so there's no downside to blasting the message to everyone. There's actually a pretty big downside: list fatigue. Over time, as recipients receive multiple messages they don't find relevant, they become less and less likely to respond, and more and more likely to report your messages as spam.

    This in turn, lowers your sender-reputation score, the most important factor ISPs use in determining whether to filter your message to the junk folder instead of the inbox. The end result? A damaged brand ("Just what I need, another email from that company") and deliverability issues that can prevent engaged recipients from receiving your messages.

  • Myth #2: You get a bigger response rate if you send to a bigger list. It seems logical, but it is just not true. Sending to an additional number of warm bodies does not necessarily generate higher click-throughs. In fact, it can actually produce higher spam complaints. You are much more likely to increase response rates when you send relevant, targeted messages to smaller subsets of your lists.

How to Apply RFM Segmentation to Email Lists


Email marketing allows you to measure customer interaction and engagement in many more ways than direct mailing could ever do. Depending on your email database and marketing strategy, other metrics can be used in place of the traditional RFM parameters, giving you many different ways to perform RFM analysis:

 RFM Category  
 Applicable Email, CRM or Web-Analytics Metric
 Recency
  • The date of the last purchase
  • The date of the last email click-through
  • The date of the last lead-generation conversion
 Frequency
  • The number of times each recipient purchased over a set period of time
  • The number of times each recipient clicked over a set period of time
  • The number of lead-generation conversions over a set period of time
 Monetary
  • The total amount spent over a set period of time
  • The total estimated value based on factors like cost-per-lead and revenue-per-lead over a period of time
  • A cumulative engagement score derived from different metrics over a set period of time

Once you've decided which metrics make the most sense for your business, you'll need to tie your email database to the system that contains purchase or conversion history, such as your CRM or Web-analytics tool.

Now you are ready to perform RFM segmentation.

Because RFM has been a direct-marketing staple for so many years, many popular data-mining and statistical analysis tools generate ready-made RFM-classification reports. However, if you don't use statistical analysis tools, fear not. Unlike other predictive-modeling techniques, RFM is based on past customer behavior and does not require heavy statistics-driven analysis.

One way to perform RFM segmentation is to simply sort your list for recency, in order of highest to lowest. You then divide the list into five equal segments, giving the top 20 percent a recency score of 5, the next 20 percent a score of 4 and so on. Each recency segment is then sorted for frequency and divided into five equal segments, resulting in 25 recency plus frequency segments. Each of these segments is then sorted for monetary and divided into five equal segments, leaving you with 125 segments that have RFM scores ranging from 555 to 111. This is your RFM index.

Deriving an RFM Index
















One popular method for deriving an RFM index from your database. (Source: Quick Profits With RFM Analysis by Arthur Middleton Hughes)

Of course, depending on the size of your database, you could divide it into deciles or other n-tiles, instead of quintiles. Or if you are very familiar with your database, you could simply use intuitive groupings, such as "purchased in last month, last three months, last six months or greater than six months," as the basis for your RFM classifications.

As you can see, RFM is very adaptable, and with some experimentation, you will be able to obtain dramatic lift gains.

Sending Different Types of Email Campaigns to Different RFM Segments


Once you've assigned all of the records in your database a specific RFM classification, you run a test campaign, typically on 10 percent of your list, to determine which RFM groups to mail to.

In traditional direct mail, you perform a break-even analysis to determine which mailing recipients are profitable. You look at the test-group response rate for each RFM cell, and then stop mailing to cells whose response rates are less than the rate required to break even on mailing costs.

In email, however, the goal is not to simply stop mailing to your weakest segments, it's to find the right tactics that resonate with and re-engage lower-scoring recipients, too. So you can test different types of messages to see which RFM segments respond best to which types of campaigns, and stop sending those particular campaign types to segments that fail the breakeven test.

Or, instead of using the breakeven metric, you could simply compare the conversion rates of different RFM segments and send future campaigns only to the groups who convert the best.

Here are some ideas for the types of campaigns that may work best with different RFM segments:

  • High Recency, High Frequency and High Monetary: Reward your most loyal customers and prospects with exclusive email privileges that make them feel special. For example, some retailers automatically offer free shipping and other perks to their best online customers.

  • High Recency, Low Frequency and Low Monetary: This segment includes your newest customers or subscribers. Give them a good first impression of your company with welcome offers, product-usage tips or other information that newbies would find helpful.

  • Low Recency, Low Frequency and Low Monetary: As in direct marketing, your least-engaged recipients simply may not be worth mailing to. But in email marketing, they may be great candidates for a re-opt-in campaign. Double-check whether they still want to hear from you, and remove them from your list if they don't.


Use RFM to Send Better Messages to Your Best Email Recipients


RFM segmentation is a relatively simple way to break down your email list based on recipients' past behaviors. Let it lift you out of the ineffective realm of batch-and-blast, and into a whole new world of targeted email with conversion rates that soar. Trust a Lyris email expert to do the RFM analysis for you and advise you on email-segmentation best practices.

###

About the Author


Emily Chen is a senior integrated marketing consultant for Lyris. She uses a data-driven approach and industry best practices to help clients optimize all aspects of their e-marketing programs, from contact strategy to creative design to marketing analytics.

Related Resources:
Comments (8)Add Comment
re: why not use only recency and frequency
written by Emily Chen, August 14, 2009
Hi Marc,

Thank you for the great question. The lift in the response rate that you can obtain by using Monetary on its own is usually not very significant when compared with Recency on its own or Frequency on its own. However, in most cases you will obtain a higher lift when using the three behavioral parameters together than just the first two.

Having said that, one of the advantages of RFM is its adaptability. If obtaining the data for Monetary involves a large amount of effort, you could experiment with other parameters. But keep in mind that the objective of predictive models is to be able to target your customers more accurately. Each application is different, and experimenting on what works best will allow you to reach an optimal solution.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
why not use only recency and frequency
written by Marc Borgers, August 10, 2009
Hi Emily,
Thanks for your article. I have a question though. In the underlaying article of Arthur Middleton Hughes I read that Monetary value has in most cases almost no effect. Everybody can/should check this for their own business, but if so, why not use RF segmentation. Only look at Recency and Frequency. That makes it even more easy to apply because you reduce the number of segments enormously. Especially when you have a small database. Thanks.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +3
Easy to implement - Effective for results
written by Jim Fonner, July 27, 2009
This is one of the best techniques that small businesses can put to use without a high level programer or an internet guru on the payroll. Most of us have at least two of the three filter informations at our fingertips but have not mined these specifics. I like the "responsibility" aspect of doing the filtering too. It is almost always beneficial to be more discerning!
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
Sr. Technology Analyst
written by Damien Fairbairn, July 23, 2009
Hello Emily, thanks for interesting article about RFM and client segmentation. Working for a small company, but utilizing email marketing it is always so helpful to know better ways to slice and dice data from our vendors. Although I don't manage our email campaign, I know we can do a better job at analyzing our campaigns and this seems like a good way to start! I enjoyed reading about the mythbusting above, sometimes its counterintuitive, but after reading, it makes a lot of sense. Thanks and I'll keep checking here.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
Product Marketing Manager
written by Guillermo Orriols, July 23, 2009
Emily,

Great article. I am familiar with RFM from reading articles on the web. They mostly deal with direct mailing applications to RFM and rehash the original technique.

Your article certainly provides a fresh perspective on how to apply this decades old analysis tool to my current e-mail marketing needs. Great suggestions on how to apply new metrics to RFM.

Please keep them coming.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +4
Target Your Best Customers With RFM Segmentation
written by Andrew Molobetsi, July 23, 2009
Hi Emily,

Best advise for my life insurance business by far this year. Came just when I was still wondering just where to get the best strategy of getting more revenue from my existing clients. Now I know this is it.

I can't wait to start my email campaign based on your RFM tips.

I can't thank you enough
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +3
Arthur - Apologies, how rude of us!
written by Anita Taylor, Editor of Inside Lyris HQ, July 23, 2009
Arthur, my deepest apologies for not properly attributing the diagram to your excellent paper, Quick Profits With RFM Analysis (http://www.dbmarketing.com/articles/Art149.htm). I've corrected the article.

My fault, not Emily's, by the way. She supplied the source to me, and I forgot to stick it in the caption.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Senior Strategist
written by Arthur Hughes, July 23, 2009
Emily: I loved your article. It seemed so familiar to me, particularly your diagram. I wonder why you did not mention your source for any of the content of your excellent article. I am sure that the source would be pleased to have his name mentioned somewhere.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smaller | bigger

busy
 
< Prev   Next >

Lyris HQ Client Login

Flash Player Required

Lyris HQ requires the most recent version of the Adobe Flash Player, a free browser plug-in.

Get Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash Player

Advertisement
 
Email Marketing & Internet Marketing Tools - Lyris HQ
Maximize your marketing spend. Lyris HQ brings together email marketing, deliverability tools, content creation, Web analytics, search marketing and mobile marketing. Execute campaigns and review ROI performance from one integrated solution. That's the unbeatable power of Lyris HQ.
Join conversations and make connections at: