<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>10 Ways to Engage Newsletter Readers</title>
		<description>Comments for 10 Ways to Engage Newsletter Readers at http://www.lyrishq.com , comment 0 to 2 out of 2 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.lyrishq.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:54:42 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Engagement</title>
			<link>http://www.lyrishq.com/index.php/Email-Marketing/10-Ways-to-Engage-Newsletter-Readers.html#pc_29</link>
			<description>Swrakan,

I completely agree that spammers use &quot;social engineering&quot; tactics (usually in subject lines) to get their messages opened and trick readers into taking actions, but that really wasn't the point of this column. 

Instead, I was focusing on ways to engage readers to keep the &quot;digital dialogue&quot; moving and inspire discussion, like the conversation we are having now. Email has the potential to be much more than a one sided conversation and increasing reader engagement means providing more opportunities within the message than simply &quot;click here&quot;. Not every action in an email has to lead to a purchase, keeping the audience engaged means providing value that makes readers want to keep opening the next message, and responding.
 - Stefan Pollard</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:34:38 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Old thing</title>
			<link>http://www.lyrishq.com/index.php/Email-Marketing/10-Ways-to-Engage-Newsletter-Readers.html#pc_27</link>
			<description>I don't think all these advices mean anything anymore. You can try to be enthusiastic as you wish with Join me, Come to us, Become this and that - all that is already tried by spammers and auto-learned in Bayesian filters.
Basically if you do it - you are just copying the spammers.
 - Swrakan</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:35:22 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
